ArenaEV.com ArenaEV.com

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Settings
Units
Power
Standard
Consumption
Currency

Log in

Login

I forgot my password
Sign up
ADVERTISEMENTS

Peugeot e-2008 real world range test

  • Post your comment
  • Comments (1)

Vik Braykov, 07 April 2024

Peugeot Range test

The Peugeot 2008 model has been on the market for over a decade and has long been a consumers' favorite. Its second generation recently got a facelift and we tested the newest addition to the lineup - the fully electric e-2008. It comes with a 54 kWh battery pack and a 115 kW (156 hp) motor attached to the front axle. The little Frenchman is a decent city-oriented SUV on paper and its design full of character certainly helped boost its popularity.

Peugeot e-2008 real world range test

Our detailed review of the Peugeot e-2008 is coming soon, but as usual we'll start with the results of its range test. The Peugeot’s light weight, compact size and single motor should boost efficiency, making it an excellent choice for a daily driver. And since it’s basically a rebadged Jeep Avenger with fancier styling, we expect the final results to be in line.

Peugeot e-2008 real world range test

We drove our usual test routes, doing the same track both ways at constant speeds at the same place as with every other car we test. The ambient temperature while testing the e-2008 was 17°C, which is near perfect, so the Peugeot gets a bit of a bonus.

At our lowest testing speed of 60 km/h the Peugeot e-2008 really needs very little energy to keep going. It consumes only 9.7 kWh/100km, which allows you to travel over 500 km on a single charge.

Upping the pace to 90 km/h sees the e-2008 match its direct rivals as the consumption starts going up, but it's still a decent showing.

Range test results

  • 60 km/h
  • 90 km/h
  • 130 km/h
Mercedes-Benz EQS 450+ Mercedes-Benz EQS 450+
876 km
12.3 kWh/100km 21°C
BMW i7 xDrive60 BMW i7 xDrive60
833 km
12.2 kWh/100km 24°C
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 580 4Matic Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 580 4Matic
808 km
14.6 kWh/100km 16°C
Tesla Model Y Long Range (2023) Tesla Model Y Long Range (2023)
728 km
10.3 kWh/100km 38°C
Hyundai Ioniq 6 LR AWD Hyundai Ioniq 6 LR AWD
708 km
10.6 kWh/100km 24°C
Kia EV9 99.8 kWh AWD Kia EV9 99.8 kWh AWD
706 km
13.6 kWh/100km 11°C
Volkswagen ID.4 GTX Volkswagen ID.4 GTX
675 km
11.4 kWh/100km 17°C
Nissan Ariya 87 kWh FWD Nissan Ariya 87 kWh FWD
659 km
13.2 kWh/100km 11°C
Tesla Model S 75D (2018, used) Tesla Model S 75D (2018, used)
633 km
10.5 kWh/100km 23°C
Volkswagen ID.Buzz Volkswagen ID.Buzz
616 km
12.5 kWh/100km 20°C
Hyundai Kona Electric 64kWh Hyundai Kona Electric 64kWh
609 km
10.5 kWh/100km 11°C
Polestar 2 Polestar 2
570 km
12.8 kWh/100km 15°C
BMW i5 BMW i5
568 km
14.3 kWh/100km 3°C
Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4kWh Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4kWh
564 km
11.6 kWh/100km 11°C
Mercedes-Benz EQE AMG 43 4Matic Mercedes-Benz EQE AMG 43 4Matic
552 km
16.4 kWh/100km 25°C
Renault Megane E-Tech EV60 Renault Megane E-Tech EV60
540 km
10.2 kWh/100km 30°C
Peugeot e-2008 Peugeot e-2008
524 km
9.7 kWh/100km 17°C
Jeep Avenger Jeep Avenger
520 km
9.8 kWh/100km 26°C
Volvo EX30 Performance Volvo EX30 Performance
485 km
13.2 kWh/100km 18°C
Fiat 500e Fiat 500e
444 km
8.4 kWh/100km 20°C
Mercedes-Benz EQS 450+ Mercedes-Benz EQS 450+
733 km
14.7 kWh/100km 21°C
Hyundai Ioniq 6 LR AWD Hyundai Ioniq 6 LR AWD
564 km
13.3 kWh/100km 24°C
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 580 4Matic Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 580 4Matic
554 km
21.3 kWh/100km 16°C
BMW i7 xDrive60 BMW i7 xDrive60
550 km
18.5 kWh/100km 24°C
Tesla Model Y Long Range (2023) Tesla Model Y Long Range (2023)
528 km
14.2 kWh/100km 38°C
Volkswagen ID.4 GTX Volkswagen ID.4 GTX
507 km
15.2 kWh/100km 17°C
Kia EV9 99.8 kWh AWD Kia EV9 99.8 kWh AWD
495 km
21.4 kWh/100km 11°C
Hyundai Kona Electric 64kWh Hyundai Kona Electric 64kWh
481 km
13.3 kWh/100km 11°C
Volkswagen ID.Buzz Volkswagen ID.Buzz
472 km
17.3 kWh/100km 20°C
BMW i5 BMW i5
461 km
17.6 kWh/100km 3°C
Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4kWh Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4kWh
461 km
14.2 kWh/100km 11°C
Nissan Ariya 87 kWh FWD Nissan Ariya 87 kWh FWD
460 km
18.9 kWh/100km 11°C
Mercedes-Benz EQE AMG 43 4Matic Mercedes-Benz EQE AMG 43 4Matic
442 km
20.5 kWh/100km 25°C
Tesla Model S 75D (2018, used) Tesla Model S 75D (2018, used)
426 km
15.6 kWh/100km 23°C
Renault Megane E-Tech EV60 Renault Megane E-Tech EV60
411 km
14.6 kWh/100km 30°C
Polestar 2 Polestar 2
388 km
18.8 kWh/100km 15°C
Volvo EX30 Performance Volvo EX30 Performance
368 km
17.4 kWh/100km 18°C
Jeep Avenger Jeep Avenger
349 km
14.6 kWh/100km 26°C
Peugeot e-2008 Peugeot e-2008
348 km
14.6 kWh/100km 17°C
Fiat 500e Fiat 500e
291 km
12.8 kWh/100km 20°C
Mercedes-Benz EQS 450+ Mercedes-Benz EQS 450+
521 km
20.7 kWh/100km 21°C
BMW i7 xDrive60 BMW i7 xDrive60
506 km
20.1 kWh/100km 24°C
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 580 4Matic Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 580 4Matic
408 km
28.9 kWh/100km 16°C
Mercedes-Benz EQE AMG 43 4Matic Mercedes-Benz EQE AMG 43 4Matic
371 km
24.4 kWh/100km 25°C
Tesla Model S 75D (2018, used) Tesla Model S 75D (2018, used)
341 km
19.5 kWh/100km 23°C
Volkswagen ID.4 GTX Volkswagen ID.4 GTX
338 km
22.8 kWh/100km 17°C
Nissan Ariya 87 kWh FWD Nissan Ariya 87 kWh FWD
337 km
25.8 kWh/100km 11°C
Hyundai Ioniq 6 LR AWD Hyundai Ioniq 6 LR AWD
336 km
22.3 kWh/100km 24°C
Tesla Model Y Long Range (2023) Tesla Model Y Long Range (2023)
334 km
22.4 kWh/100km 38°C
BMW i5 BMW i5
329 km
24.7 kWh/100km 3°C
Polestar 2 Polestar 2
300 km
24.3 kWh/100km 15°C
Kia EV9 99.8 kWh AWD Kia EV9 99.8 kWh AWD
289 km
33.2 kWh/100km 11°C
Hyundai Kona Electric 64kWh Hyundai Kona Electric 64kWh
282 km
22.7 kWh/100km 11°C
Renault Megane E-Tech EV60 Renault Megane E-Tech EV60
273 km
22 kWh/100km 30°C
Volkswagen ID.Buzz Volkswagen ID.Buzz
262 km
29.4 kWh/100km 20°C
Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4kWh Hyundai Kona Electric 65.4kWh
261 km
25.1 kWh/100km 11°C
Volvo EX30 Performance Volvo EX30 Performance
251 km
23.5 kWh/100km 18°C
Peugeot e-2008 Peugeot e-2008
231 km
22 kWh/100km 17°C
Jeep Avenger Jeep Avenger
229 km
22.3 kWh/100km 26°C
Fiat 500e Fiat 500e
191 km
19.5 kWh/100km 20°C

At the highest testing speed of 130 km/h it becomes evident the e-2008 is designed for city traffic. Its consumption rises drastically as do most of its direct rivals. The good news is the e-2008 still retains a tiny edge.

Overall, the Peugeot e-2008 is a very efficient vehicle, particularly for doing your daily city commutes. As expected the results are in line with the Jeep Avenger at all speeds, though, so picking one or the other better be based on features, design available deals.

Peugeot e-2008 real world range test

You can now use the widget below to find out the Peugeot e-2008’s range in every combination of speed and temperature you might need. We've used our real world tests and a complex model to provide an estimate that should be as close to the actual performance as possible.

This article contains localized units and prices. Change settings.
Your choice
Related articles
  • Volvo EX30 Performance real world range test Volvo EX30 Performance real world range test
  • Jeep Avenger real world range test Jeep Avenger real world range test
  • Hyundai Ioniq 6 LR AWD real world range test Hyundai Ioniq 6 LR AWD real world range test
  • Hyundai Kona 2024 vs Hyundai Kona 2019 range test Hyundai Kona 2024 vs Hyundai Kona 2019 range test

Reader comments

E
  • Eugene
  • sHm
  • 06 Jun 2024

Author, real range for 250mi is 214 devide to 54kwt battery pack, and you get 3.9m/kwt.... please correct, not 6.4. It's better then BYD 3.3 but much worse then tesla Model Y 4.6

  • Reply
  • Read all comments
  • Post your comment
Total reader comments: 1

  • Home
  • Compare
  • News
  • Terms
  • Reviews
  • About us
  • Tesla
  • Volkswagen
  • Audi
  • Porsche
  • BMW
  • Mercedes
  • Hyundai
  • Kia
  • Genesis
  • Renault
  • Nissan
  • Ford
  • Volvo
  • Polestar
  • Jaguar
  • Toyota
  • Mazda
  • Mini
  • MG
  • Vinfast
  • Skoda
  • Cupra
  • Peugeot
  • Opel
  • Fiat
  • Dacia
  • Nio
  • Xpeng
  • BYD
  • [..]

EV finder

ADVERTISEMENTS

Latest models

  • ModelXiaomi
    YU7 Max
  • ModelNissan
    Leaf 75kWh
  • ModelTesla
    Model S Plaid
  • ModelNissan
    Micra EV 52kWh
  • ModelTesla
    Model X Plaid
  • ModelGenesis
    GV60 Performance AWD

Featured

  • EREV or Extended Range Electric Vehicle explained EREV or Extended Range Electric Vehicle explained
  • Why electric cars don't have conventional gearboxes Why electric cars don't have conventional gearboxes
  • Audi Q8 55 e-tron alternatives - BMW iX xDrive50 and Polestar 3 LR Audi Q8 55 e-tron alternatives - BMW iX xDrive50 and Polestar 3 LR
  • Real-life test reveals how much range EVs lose in the cold Real-life test reveals how much range EVs lose in the cold
  • NCM, NCA, LFP, solid-state - EV battery chemistry explained NCM, NCA, LFP, solid-state - EV battery chemistry explained
ADVERTISEMENTS

Reviews

  • 57 electric cars range tested at highway speeds - who wins? PART 1 57 electric cars range tested at highway speeds - who wins? PART 1
  • Hyundai Ioniq 5 N review Hyundai Ioniq 5 N review
  • BMW i7 xDrive60 review BMW i7 xDrive60 review
  • Volkswagen ID. Buzz Pro review Volkswagen ID. Buzz Pro review

Home News Compare About us RSS feed Facebook Twitter Instagram

© 2022-2025 ArenaEV.com Mobile version EV Finder Glossary Privacy Terms of use

From the team behind
GSMArena.com

OSZAR »